<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trying out NoListing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.apokalyptik.com/2007/01/23/trying-out-nolisting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.apokalyptik.com/2007/01/23/trying-out-nolisting/</link>
	<description>The random things that spew forth from my brain...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:43:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19620</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: apokalyptik</title>
		<link>http://blog.apokalyptik.com/2007/01/23/trying-out-nolisting/comment-page-1/#comment-7169</link>
		<dc:creator>apokalyptik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.apokalyptik.com/2007/01/23/trying-out-nolisting/#comment-7169</guid>
		<description>Well it turns out that a number of valid (and I use the term loosely) MTA&#039;s on the internet dont like this and permanently bombed out, leaving mail undelivered to bounce at a later date. In a perfect world, those MTAs (I&#039;ll let you make guesses at which ones didn&#039;t like it) would do what they&#039;re supposed to do.  But then in a perfect world the spammer MTAs would also.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth it unless you&#039;re willing to accept that some domains will simply not talk to you any longer.  If you&#039;re a person? great. if you&#039;re a company? not so great.  Up to you.  Trying it was easy, but waiting for the bounces is a pain (some MTAs wait a long time before finally bouncing mail) If you find differently... let me know! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it turns out that a number of valid (and I use the term loosely) MTA&#039;s on the internet dont like this and permanently bombed out, leaving mail undelivered to bounce at a later date. In a perfect world, those MTAs (I&#039;ll let you make guesses at which ones didn&#039;t like it) would do what they&#039;re supposed to do.  But then in a perfect world the spammer MTAs would also.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth it unless you&#039;re willing to accept that some domains will simply not talk to you any longer.  If you&#039;re a person? great. if you&#039;re a company? not so great.  Up to you.  Trying it was easy, but waiting for the bounces is a pain (some MTAs wait a long time before finally bouncing mail) If you find differently&#8230; let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.apokalyptik.com/2007/01/23/trying-out-nolisting/comment-page-1/#comment-7166</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.apokalyptik.com/2007/01/23/trying-out-nolisting/#comment-7166</guid>
		<description>How did you go with the nolisting? I am interested to know if it was worth the effort or not. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you go with the nolisting? I am interested to know if it was worth the effort or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 212/230 objects using memcached

Served from: blog.apokalyptik.com @ 2012-02-08 03:59:56 -->
